Now, before getting further into this, I intend to clarify my sights on the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro with the turbocharged 2.0 L 4-cylinder engine. I assume that it is going to sell fairly well in the North American market, where those folks who want the style of the new Camaro with the best fuel economy possible will gladly buy up this new engine option. GM has promised that it will certainly be one of the most efficient alternative for 2016 so for those folks who are least worried about performance– this new turbocharged 4-cylinder factory will be an easy choice.
However, the 2015 Ford Mustang EcoBoost has broader appeal, attracting both the buyers who desire style as well as fuel economy as well as those which do care about performance. Not simply does the EcoBoost Mustang has a significant power advantage over the turbo Camaro, but it has proven to be a very capable performance engine with very minor upgrades.
2016 Camaro Turbo EcoBoost
Certainly, the same could quite well be true of the Camaro with the turbocharged 4-cylinder, but the Camaro is entering the battle with a drawback of 35 horsepower and 25lb-ft of torque. This presents a marketing challenge for GM, as they try to attract those buyers who aren’t set on one car or the other in shopping for a pony car with a good mix of energy economic climate and performance. If absolutely nothing else, Ford has an extremely clear advertising edge, boasting more than 300hp while the Camaro does not … and that is the example that matters to John Q Carbuyer.
When the 2016 Chevrolet Camaro was presented last month in Detroit, we found out that the brand-new generation GM muscle car would come with a turbocharged 4-cylinder engine similar to that offered in the 2015 Ford Mustang EcoBoost, however based on the specs of the Camaro super 4, it appears extremely not likely that GM will see the same success from their fuel-sipping model as Ford does– at the very least not in the United States.
The Camaro group was especially extreme, however with 310 horsepower and 320lb-ft of twist, the EcoBoost Mustang is still a really solid performance car. The EcoBoost has expanded to be so popular that the most current sales statement from Ford points out that the 2.3 L EcoBoost engine is the bestselling alternative in the current Mustang lineup in some extremely big markets.
Based on the popularity of the EcoBoost Mustang, I fully expected to see a turbocharged 4-cylinder 2016 Camaro, especially when considering the fact that the Camaro is based on a comparable chassis system to the Cadillac ATS coupe which likewise includes a stout turbocharged 4-cylinder. When the brand-new 2016 Camaro specs were announced, with a turbocharged 4 that only offers 275hp and 295lb-ft of twist, I was surprised that GM had not lifted the output of the 2.0 L turbo 4 to much better compete with the EcoBoost Mustang.
The Turbocharged 2016 Camaro
This relatively slight difference in power could trigger the Camaro’s turbocharged 4 to have a hard time in the US while the EcoBoost Mustang flourishes, yet I think that deep down, GM isn’t truly concerned concerning US sales of the turbo Camaro. The V6 Camaro provides a really similar level of performance and also fuel economic situation to the EcoBoost so while non-V8 Mustang buyers have actually gathered to the EcoBoost, non-V8 Camaro buyers in the United States are likely to continue leaning to the V6.
The Turbo 4 Camaro Issues Overseas
While the 2.0 L super Camaro could struggle to take on the EcoBoost Mustang on United States dirt, I think that the far more important battle will be waged outside of North America. The Camaro has long been available around the world, but only with the V8 engine option and that means that in other parts of the world, the Camaro of the past few years was extremely expensive to buy and very costly to feed. GM has actually not offered the V6 overseas, so there has been no real alternative to enable foreign Camaro fans an even more economical option when muscle car purchasing.
On the other hand, when the 2015 Ford Mustang was introduced on a global degree, it was immediately clear that they planned to supply both the Mustang GT and the Mustang EcoBoost all over the globe. Like the previous generation Camaro, the Mustang GT will certainly face high prices and big gas expenses while the 2.3 L EcoBoost features a lower cost, fewer fines for bad energy economic situation and less price in keep it fueled up. That gives Ford a significant advantage in the global muscle car war and that is where the turbo 4 Camaro enters into play.
I required that the 2.0 L super engine in the 2016 Camaro will be most prominent in those markets where gas rates are a lot higher and where the 3.6 L V6 is not offered. Those individuals which have actually really wanted to buy a Camaro in Europe or Asia in the previous, but who were turned off by the high costs involved with the V8 engine will now have an affordable, efficient engine choice that will much better fit their needs– simply like the EcoBoost has done for the Mustang abroad.
So, while the EcoBoost Mustang continues to grow in appeal over the V6 base model in the US, I expect the V6 Camaro to proceed to be one of the most popular choice while Chinese and also european buyers will probably align for the energy drinking turbo 4 Camaro.2016 camaro 2 0 turbo drive,2016 chevy camaro ecoboost,camaro ecoboost,camaro eco boost,2016 camaro eco boost?